20 Oct MANUAL VS. AUTOMATION TESTING
Manual vs. Automation testing: Which works better?
Software testing is a big domain, but this process can be broadly classified into 2 areas: Manual testing and Automation testing.
Manual Testing
Manual software testing is the procedure in which QA experts execute tests one by one manually and record the results. When a test case fails the tester needs to create a bug ticket in the Bug Tracking tool. The purpose of manual software testing is to catch feature issues and bugs before software goes to live.
Automation testing
Automation software testing is the procedure in which testers use tools as well as scripts to automate software testing efforts. It helps testers execute more test cases and enhance test coverage in shorter time.
Manual vs. Automation testing – Advantages and disadvantages
Manual and automated software testing cover 2 vast areas and within every category specific software testing types are available such as Unit testing, Integration testing, System testing, Interface testing, Smoke testing, Regression Testing and Acceptance testing.
A few of these ways are better suited to the manual option, and a few are greatly performed via automation testing. Here’s a brief comparison of manual vs. automation testing, along with some advantages and disadvantages.
| Manual testing Time-consuming process, taking up physical resources Due to human error it’s not perfect at all times, hence it’s less reliable, commonly used for small and medium scale projects It is suitable where the test cases are to be run just few times and frequent repetition is not needed. It allows for the human observation that might be more helpful if the target is user-friendliness Programming or coding knowledge is not required. | Automation testing Automation testing is executed by software tools, so it’s extremely quicker than the manual approach Automation testing is a lot more reliable, as it’s performed by tools, commonly used for large scale projects. Automation testing is a practical choice when test cases are needed to be run again and again over the long term Automation testing doesn’t entail human involvement and can’t guarantee use-friendliness Coding knowledge is mandatory, typically Python, JavaScript, PHP etc. |
It’s suited for usability testing, exploratory testing, and ad-hoc testing. Usability focuses on measuring an app’s user-friendliness. Ad-hoc uses a free approach in which the testing engineer tries to break modules without a set situation. Exploratory testing focuses on software tester’s skill, experience, knowledge, creativity, intuition, and analytical reasoning.
Automation testing is suitable for regression testing, load testing, performance testing and extremely repeatable test cases. Automation testing should be the main part of the DevOps cycle. In short, you’d mechanize every test that you can.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.